If you do not like this behavior it can be disabled. Right-click an empty area of the taskbar and choose 'Properties'.
Word - Pages Move And Zoom When The Mouse Is Lightly Touched How To Work WithClick the 'Start Menu' tab./Rect In this episode, Daniel and Vonne demonstrate the different document views and zoom options available in Word 2016. Here you will see how to work with the read mode, web layout, outline, draft, and print layout views. They also cover single and multi-page view, the ruler, and zoom functions.It does not come from the battery.However this is challenging since Firefox has already claimed 'Ctrl-S' for its "Save Page As" function. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv: 1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox 2.0.0.1I have a DOM/ECMAScript application where I want to submit a form when the user presses the Ctrl-S keyboard shortcut. To solve this bug, just trash the trackpad's preference file (.plist) which is located in the Preferences folder of your user's Library and restart the Mac.Sometimes a mouse has pre set items, like Zoom Etc., but these can all be reset in Control Panel > Mouse - Regards - Thank you, that seems to have done the trick - restoring default settings. I've seen a few sites taking over Alt key combos through JavaScript since we've changed the content accesskey modifier to Alt+Shift.IE7 either opens the "Save As." dialog or simply swallows the event if Save As. But I thought I'd focus on the concrete problem instance rather than prematurely generalizing the issue :-)> That is not a hack, but maybe we should change that functionality.+1 for not letting web content take over browser shortcuts.This is currently possible for both and (i.e. Surprising users who expect Ctrl-S to result in the 'Save Page As' dialog) but I think it's at least worth some discussion and consideration.I also realize that my Ctrl-S issue is just an instance of a more general issue - namely that there's a potential for conflict whenever a DOM/ECMAScript application wishes to use a keyboard shortcut that the browser's already reserved. Whether focus is in an input box or not).I realize this opens up other usability issues (e.g. I've observed that Gmail has a similar problem binding Ctrl-S to its 'Send Email' function.This bug is to address allowing DOM/ECMAScript developers to bind to Ctrl-S and effectively override Firefox's Ctrl-S binding in all circumstances (i.e. Gba emulator for mac el capitanExtensions can always add some new> keyboard shortcuts, like DOMi adds Ctrl+Shift+iThis is actually making my point I'm not sure it's feasible to say "Page appsCan't override browser-owned keyboard shortcuts" because this would requireFirefox to explicitly reserve a set of keyboard shortcuts, which is very hardTo do if your goal is to be an extensible platform.This is why it's my (humble) opinion that Firefox should explicitly allow pageApps to override normal browser keyboard shortcuts and it's up to the page appDesigner to shoulder the burden of usability. Alt+Shift) as only possible accelerator.> So I'd say publish a clear policy on which keyboard shortcuts page> apps may and may not use, and then absolutely prevent page apps from> using browser-reserved keyboard shortcuts,> But how could this be done. Never pass those events to web content (so that content authors don't lose time fiddling around with which combos might possibly be available).Unfortunately, such a change would effectively leave content authors once more with only (i.e. Only pass those events to web content when they weren't handled by chrome.3. Make accel/access key events non-cancelable for web content.2. Create a linear trend line in 2008 excel for macComment 17 sums it pretty much: if the shortcuts are there, they should work.Also, consider the security implications, we had the file picker text box locked because scripts could be able to change its content: and now, with this, a page is effectively allowed to steal keyboard input and do something instead of the browser, I wonder if there isn't some room for an attack where a combination triggers some dialog or reaction similar to what the Firefox UI would do, then enticing the user to enter personal data, as he trusts the shortcut and everything looks normal in the interface they are seeing.After reading through the entire thread, I think there is a consideration missing.The application (JavaScript) could simply be allowed to request advanced permissions from the browser for such things as keyboard shortcut overrides. Or reply to the message, if you're in MS OWA and you happen to have the focus on a message, of course.Designing an "interactive web app mode" where there is a single, unoverridable shortcut that gets the user out of that mode would perhaps be the best way to implement web application shortcuts without rendering Firefox's UI unusable with keyboards In any other way, I think we can say Firefox's UI does not offer keyboard interaction. For example, Outlook Web Access, the webmail interface for Microsoft Exchange: — if the focus is on the page, Control+Q won't trigger anything other than "mark message as read" (I'd say this classifies as data loss if you had an old message selected in a big inbox and you had it marked as unread for the explicit purpose of keeping track of it)There is also Control+R, which is supposed to reload the current page. You can't.This gets worse when using the expected UI keystrokes inside an interactive Javascript web page can lead to data loss because instead of the UI command, the page catches that keystroke and uses some other command the user may as well as not know about. Take, for example, StackExchange.com: try writing an answer and either hitting control+L to get to the URL bar or control+K to get to the search bar. Catch by default all keyboard input, irrespective of where it's generated (plugin, addon, JS, etc.) 2. Nevertheless, the dreadful "mad monkey syndrome", where inadvertent keystrokes play havoc with some important Web applications (risk of data loss!), should be taken into account.That said, here is my sketch of solution:1. For me, it all boils down to usage flexibility and intuitiveness.Most probably lambda-users will never bother (or even now) about shortcuts configuration. When the user clicks allow or deny)This puts the control back into the hands of the user without completely robbing applications of the ability to add useful enhancements to their advanced web applications.The line between desktop app and browser app is quickly becoming blurred further and further and we need to continually re-evaluate our take on topics as the world's view and understanding of the technology at hand changes.My personal power-user and minimal UI development experience tells me that White} is right. ![]() Websites override non-US keyboard layout keystrokes which is more-or-less the same problem as above (many non-US keyboards use ALT and CTRL combos for non-English characters and diacritics). Websites override platform keystrokes, not just browser keystrokes, so checking for conflicts with browser reserved keystrokes is inadaquate. Moreover, having the browser always in control of keyboard input would improve security, though there'll be inevitably some performance loss.Problems with some of the above suggestions: As a small flashing icon/text in the status bar.IMHO, that would allow users (even lambda ones!) to learn progressively about apps/plugins/addons's shortcuts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorJon ArchivesCategories |